ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Who is serving whom? Exploring the mechanisms linking technology dependence to work engagement.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As technological advances increasingly shape the world of work, it is becoming clear that the impact of increased employee dependence on technology for task completion may have ambivalent effects. While successfully mastered technological tools make the work more engaging by enabling a simpler and more efficient implementation of tasks, the necessity to keep up with technological progress imposes additional demands to adopt innovations and limits the freedom of choice about how work is performed. With this study, we sought to unravel whether the effect of technology dependence at work on employee autonomy satisfaction and subsequent work engagement is conditional and depends on increased learning demands. A heterogeneous sample of 753 employees participated in the survey. We used conditional process analysis to test our hypotheses. Results revealed that it is not dependence on technology itself that is relevant for autonomy and work engagement, but rather its combination with intensified learning demands. For employees who reported fewer learning pressures, technology dependence was an enabling (i.e., facilitating autonomy satisfaction) factor, associated with higher work engagement. Conversely, for those who experienced greater learning demands, technology dependence was associated with lower autonomy satisfaction and lower work engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.