Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045969›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Who is serving whom? Exploring the mechanisms linking technology dependence to work engagement.

Arūnas Žiedelis, Ieva Urbanavičiūtė, Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, Rita Jakštienė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arūnas ŽiedelisOrganizational Psychology Research Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ieva UrbanavičiūtėOrganizational Psychology Research Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jurgita Lazauskaitė-ZabielskėOrganizational Psychology Research Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rita JakštienėOrganizational Psychology Research Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technological advances increasingly shape the world of work, it is becoming clear that the impact of increased employee dependence on technology for task completion may have ambivalent effects. While successfully mastered technological tools make the work more engaging by enabling a simpler and more efficient implementation of tasks, the necessity to keep up with technological progress imposes additional demands to adopt innovations and limits the freedom of choice about how work is performed. With this study, we sought to unravel whether the effect of technology dependence at work on employee autonomy satisfaction and subsequent work engagement is conditional and depends on increased learning demands. A heterogeneous sample of 753 employees participated in the survey. We used conditional process analysis to test our hypotheses. Results revealed that it is not dependence on technology itself that is relevant for autonomy and work engagement, but rather its combination with intensified learning demands. For employees who reported fewer learning pressures, technology dependence was an enabling (i.e., facilitating autonomy satisfaction) factor, associated with higher work engagement. Conversely, for those who experienced greater learning demands, technology dependence was associated with lower autonomy satisfaction and lower work engagement.

Indexed as

autonomybasic need satisfactionlearning demandstechnology dependencework engagement

Identifiers

PMID40045969
PMCPMC11879963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.