ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Comparing self-reported race and genetic ancestry for identifying potential differentially methylated sites in endometrial cancer: insights from African ancestry proportions using machine learning models.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing among all US women, Black women face higher mortality rates. The reasons for this remain unclear. In this study, whole genome differential methylation analysis, along with state-of-the-art computational methods such as the recursive feature elimination technique and supervised/unsupervised machine learning models, was used to identify 38 epigenetic signature genes (ESGs) and four core-ESGs (cg19933311: TRPC5; cg09651654: APOBEC1; cg27299712: PLEKHG5; cg03150409: WHSC1) in endometrial tumors from Black and White women, incorporating genetic ancestry estimation. Methylation at two Core-ESGs, namely APOBEC1 and PLEKHG5, showed statistically significant overall survival differences between the two ancestral groups (Likelihood ratio test; P value = 0.006). Moreover, our comprehensive ancestry-based analysis revealed that tumors from women with high African ancestry exhibited increased hypomethylation compared to those with low African ancestry. These hypomethylated genes were enriched in drug metabolism pathways, indicating a potential link between genetic ancestry, epigenetic modifications, and pharmacogenomic responses. Combining ancestry, race, and disease type may help identify which patient groups will benefit most from these biomarkers for targeted treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.