Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045663›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2025

Abscission zones: cellular interfaces for the programmed separation of organs.

Véronique Pautot, Jennifer Crick, Shelley R Hepworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Unraveling the mechanisms of fruit abscission inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Advances in cotton harvesting aids.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Véronique PautotUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institute Jean-Pierre Bourgin for Plant Sciences (IJPB), 78000, Versailles, France.
Jennifer CrickDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.
Shelley R HepworthDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-3792

Funding

IJPB's Plant Observatory technological platformsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2016-06193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbscission zones are specialized sites where plants shed organs, such as leaves, petals or fruits, in response to developmental or environmental signals. These zones form at predictable locations and, once activated, undergo structural and physiological changes that detach the organ and seal the exposed area. During crop domestication, plants that retained ripe fruit or seeds were selected, and abscission traits still influence crop yield and quality today. SCOPE: This article reviews the stages of development of abscission zones: initiation, competence, separation and sealing. We combine insights from classic structural and physiological studies with modern genetic and molecular research, focusing on two plant species: Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for floral organ abscission and Solanum lycopersicum as a model for fleshy fruit development.

conclusionsThese studies show that abscission is a conserved but flexible developmental process. We conclude by exploring how these findings are being applied to improve abscission traits in modern agriculture.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisFlowersSolanum lycopersicumFruitPlant LeavesAbscission zoneArabidopsisauxinethylenefloral organ abscissionpedicel abscissiontomato

Identifiers

PMID40045663
PMCPMC12401889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.