Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045651›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025

[Development of an ideological and political education design based on course characteristics: taking high performance liquid chromatography as an example].

Hui-Li Yang, Gang-Feng Tang, Jie Lei

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui-Li YangDepartment of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Gang-Feng TangDepartment of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jie LeiDepartment of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the problems of the easy repetition of ideological and political education cases and the difficulty of evaluating ideological and political education, this study takes the classic experimental method of high performance liquid chromatography as an example to carry out the teaching practice of ideological and political education based on the characteristics of the course. First, the aim of the experiment, that is, the determination of preservatives and sweeteners in food, was introduced. Next, the specific practice processes, including case significance, case introduction, case implementation, case expansion, and effectiveness assessment, of two types of ideological and political programs, namely, universal and specialized cases, were introduced. Universal cases consider the importance of instrumental analytical experiments, while specialized cases consider the localization of high performance liquid chromatographs. We adjusted the ideological and political content of the instrumental analytical experimental course according to the course progress and actual experience of students, and integrated ideological and political education into the curriculum in stages. In addition to the functions of value guidance and ideological education, the role of ideological and political programs in promoting professional knowledge learning and innovation ability training was strengthened. We recommend that the effectiveness of ideological and political education be evaluated by mastering professional knowledge and improving innovative abilities.

Indexed as

course characteristicsideological and political educationinnovation awarenessinstrumental analysis experimentinstrument design philosophy

Identifiers

PMID40045651
PMCPMC11883533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.