Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045568›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025

Long-term outcomes of the largest (29) Epic Supra aortic valve bioprosthesis: comparing recommended with upsizing implantation.

Murat Mukharyamov, Hristo Kirov, Maria Golovina, Tulio Caldonazo, Torsten Doenst

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Murat MukharyamovDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Hristo KirovDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Maria GolovinaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Tulio CaldonazoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5697-2659
Torsten DoenstDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6411-909X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the largest available Epic Supra bioprosthesis (size 29).

methodsWe reviewed all patients who received an Epic Supra bioprosthesis between 2011 and 2023 and selected all 29 size prostheses that were implanted either into patients with an aortic annulus of at least 29 mm (sizing as recommended by the manufacturer) or into patients with smaller annuli (upsizing). Short- and long-term results were assessed. Propensity score matching was employed to improve comparability between groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival.

resultsEpic Supra bioprostheses were implanted into 1845 patients between 2011 and 2023. Mean age was 69.7 (11.2) years and 79.2% were male. Size 29 was implanted in 360 patients (mean age 68 (8.9) years), and 97.2% were male. EuroScore II was 5.1 (1.3; 6.6). One quarter of cases were performed via parasternal minithoracotomy. Mortality at 30 days was 2.8%, with no significant differences. Need for re-exploration was 3.3% and permanent pacemaker implantation was 4.7% (no statistically significant differences). Longest follow-up was 10 years with a mean of 50 (41) months. Mean prosthetic pressure gradients were 11.3 (16.7) mmHg and aortic valve reoperations/interventions were required in 5 patients (1.4%), all due to infective endocarditis.

conclusionsThis is the largest experience of Epic Supra 29 implantation worldwide. Our results illustrate exemplary clinical and haemodynamic performance. In addition, the 29 size prosthesis can safely be implanted into patients with smaller than 29 mm annulus, which may improve future valve-in-valve options.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factorsaortic valve replacementbiological prosthesescardiac surgerysizing

Identifiers

PMID40045568
PMCPMC11928935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.