ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Long-term outcomes of the largest (29) Epic Supra aortic valve bioprosthesis: comparing recommended with upsizing implantation.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the largest available Epic Supra bioprosthesis (size 29).
methodsWe reviewed all patients who received an Epic Supra bioprosthesis between 2011 and 2023 and selected all 29 size prostheses that were implanted either into patients with an aortic annulus of at least 29 mm (sizing as recommended by the manufacturer) or into patients with smaller annuli (upsizing). Short- and long-term results were assessed. Propensity score matching was employed to improve comparability between groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival.
resultsEpic Supra bioprostheses were implanted into 1845 patients between 2011 and 2023. Mean age was 69.7 (11.2) years and 79.2% were male. Size 29 was implanted in 360 patients (mean age 68 (8.9) years), and 97.2% were male. EuroScore II was 5.1 (1.3; 6.6). One quarter of cases were performed via parasternal minithoracotomy. Mortality at 30 days was 2.8%, with no significant differences. Need for re-exploration was 3.3% and permanent pacemaker implantation was 4.7% (no statistically significant differences). Longest follow-up was 10 years with a mean of 50 (41) months. Mean prosthetic pressure gradients were 11.3 (16.7) mmHg and aortic valve reoperations/interventions were required in 5 patients (1.4%), all due to infective endocarditis.
conclusionsThis is the largest experience of Epic Supra 29 implantation worldwide. Our results illustrate exemplary clinical and haemodynamic performance. In addition, the 29 size prosthesis can safely be implanted into patients with smaller than 29 mm annulus, which may improve future valve-in-valve options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.