Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045547›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025

Exploring Augmented Reality for Dental Implant Surgery: Feasibility of Using Smartphones as Navigation Tools.

Richard Mosch, Vasilios Alevizakos, Dragan Alexander Ströbele, Marcus Schiller, Constantin von See

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioinformation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard MoschDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Vasilios AlevizakosDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-5404
Dragan Alexander StröbeleDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Marcus SchillerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Constantin von SeeDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDental implant placement requires exceptional precision to ensure functional and esthetic success. Traditional guidance methods, such as static drilling guides and dynamic navigation systems, have improved accuracy but are limited by high costs, rigidity, and reliance on specialized hardware. This study introduces an augmented reality (AR) system using consumer smartphones for real-time navigation in dental implant placement. The system aims to provide a cost-effective, eco-friendly alternative to conventional methods by integrating virtual planning with physical models. MATERIAL AND

methodsA modified dental training model with removable parallel pins served as the physical component. Implant positions were digitally planned and color-coded using 3D scanning and modeling software, then integrated into an AR application built with Unity Engine. A smartphone's camera was calibrated to project virtual overlays onto the physical model. In vitro testing evaluated alignment accuracy, drill guidance, and system performance under controlled lighting conditions.

resultsThe AR system successfully aligned virtual overlays with the physical model, providing effective visual guidance for implant drill positioning. Operators maintained planned trajectories, demonstrating the feasibility of AR as an alternative to static and dynamic guidance systems. Challenges included the system's sensitivity to stable lighting and visual cues.

conclusionsThis AR-based approach offers an accessible and sustainable solution for modern dental implantology. Future research will focus on quantitative accuracy assessments, AI integration for enhanced performance, and clinical trials to validate real-world applicability. AR technology has the potential to transform dental practices by improving outcomes while reducing costs and environmental impact.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsSmartphoneSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalDental Implantsaugmented realitydental implantsimage‐guided surgerysmartphone

Identifiers

PMID40045547
PMCPMC11882750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.