Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045487›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2025

Clinical pregnancy rates after two different methods of laser-assisted hatching applied to vitrified-warmed day-3 embryos or day-5 blastocysts.

Woo Jeong Kim, Byung Chul Jee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Woo Jeong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Byung Chul JeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaser-assisted hatching (LAH) employs two distinct techniques: thinning and breaching. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of combined thinning and breaching versus breaching alone in vitrified-warmed embryo or blastocyst transfer cycles.

methodsIn total, 110 vitrified-warmed day-3 embryo transfer cycles and 50 vitrified-warmed day-5 blastocyst transfer cycles were retrospectively selected. All transfers were performed between 2021 and 2022 at a university-based infertility center. Combined thinning and breaching involved thinning either one-quarter or one-sixth of the zona pellucida circumference combined with breaching at a single point.

resultsIn vitrified-warmed day-3 embryo transfer cycles, the 'thinning and breaching' and 'breaching only' groups were similar regarding the median age of the woman (36 years vs. 37 years, respectively), number of embryos transferred (2 vs. 2), and embryo score (89 vs. 31.5). The clinical pregnancy rate (PR) (23.5% vs. 21.1%), embryo implantation rate (IR) (11.4% vs. 11.3%), and clinical miscarriage rate (25% vs. 37.5%) were also comparable between the two LAH groups. In vitrified-warmed day-5 blastocyst transfer cycles, the combination and breaching-only groups were similar in the median age of the woman (36 years vs. 36.5 years, respectively), number of blastocysts transferred (1 vs. 1), and blastocyst score (45 vs. 31.5). The clinical PR (45.5% vs. 42.9%), IR (35.4% vs. 33.3%), and clinical miscarriage rate (20% vs. 33.3%) were also similar between groups.

conclusionBreaching alone displayed similar efficacy to combined thinning and breaching in terms of clinical PR, IR, and miscarriage rate. Thus, breaching alone appears sufficient to achieve favorable pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

BlastocystLasersPregnancy rateVitrificationZona pellucida

Identifiers

PMID40045487
PMCPMC12411877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.