Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045405›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

The power of self-forgiveness: the dual impact of shame on creativity.

Tongtong Ye, Haodong Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tongtong Ye *College of Humanities, Anhui Science and Technology University, 9 DongHua Road, Fengyang County, ChuZhou, Anhui, 233100, China.
Haodong Su *College of Humanities, Anhui Science and Technology University, 9 DongHua Road, Fengyang County, ChuZhou, Anhui, 233100, China. suhaodong1997@foxmail.com.

Funding

Talent Introduction Project RWYJ202304 of Anhui Science and Technology University 200467the Talent Introduction Project RWYJ202305 of Anhui Science and Technology University 200468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some studies have begun to explore the impact of negative emotions on creativity, the psychological mechanisms through which shame, as a strongly negative emotional experience, affects creativity remain unclear. Furthermore, previous research has predominantly relied on variable-centered methods, potentially masking significant individual differences in shame within populations. Therefore, this study employs an individual-centered latent profile analysis method, grounded in cognitive adjustment model theory and emotion regulation process models, to examine the mediating role of self-forgiveness across different categories of shame. The study surveyed 1023 participants (50.60% male, 49.40% female). The results revealed that latent profile analysis identified five distinct shame groups: Shame-Context Constancy Low, Shame-Context Constancy Moderate, Shame-Context Constancy High, Shame-Context Salience Low, and Shame-Context Salience High. Self-forgiveness played a suppressive mediating role in the Shame-Context Constancy High and Shame-Context Salience High groups, which, in turn, influenced creativity. This study uncovers significant heterogeneity in shame across different groups and elucidates the complex psychological mechanisms through which shame affects creativity: high levels of shame may predict better creative performance, but the lack of self-forgiveness can inhibit the creative benefits derived from shame. These findings provide valuable insights for interventions aimed at enhancing creativity among different shame subgroups.

Indexed as

CreativityForgivenessSelf ConceptShameAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCreativityLatent profile analysisSelf-forgivenessShame

Identifiers

PMID40045405
PMCPMC11884157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.