ArticleBMC psychology2025
The power of self-forgiveness: the dual impact of shame on creativity.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations among impostor phenomenon, self-compassion, shame, and social anxiety in college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While some studies have begun to explore the impact of negative emotions on creativity, the psychological mechanisms through which shame, as a strongly negative emotional experience, affects creativity remain unclear. Furthermore, previous research has predominantly relied on variable-centered methods, potentially masking significant individual differences in shame within populations. Therefore, this study employs an individual-centered latent profile analysis method, grounded in cognitive adjustment model theory and emotion regulation process models, to examine the mediating role of self-forgiveness across different categories of shame. The study surveyed 1023 participants (50.60% male, 49.40% female). The results revealed that latent profile analysis identified five distinct shame groups: Shame-Context Constancy Low, Shame-Context Constancy Moderate, Shame-Context Constancy High, Shame-Context Salience Low, and Shame-Context Salience High. Self-forgiveness played a suppressive mediating role in the Shame-Context Constancy High and Shame-Context Salience High groups, which, in turn, influenced creativity. This study uncovers significant heterogeneity in shame across different groups and elucidates the complex psychological mechanisms through which shame affects creativity: high levels of shame may predict better creative performance, but the lack of self-forgiveness can inhibit the creative benefits derived from shame. These findings provide valuable insights for interventions aimed at enhancing creativity among different shame subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.