ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025
Quality indicators for the rehabilitation before and after total knee arthroplasty in Japan: a modified Delphi method and practice test.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic Arthrolysis of the Knee Joint Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is important to adhere to the pertinent guidelines to ensure evidence-based rehabilitation of patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, studies have suggested that pre- and post-TKA rehabilitation provided in Japan may not be adequately evidence-based. Quality indicators (QIs) translate practice guidelines into actionable and measurable statements by identifying the clinical context, timing, and target population. This study aimed to develop QIs for pre- and post-TKA rehabilitation in Japan. Additionally, a pilot practice test was conducted to assess the feasibility and applicability of the developed QIs prior to their actual clinical application.
methodsThis study used a modified Delphi technique (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method). A nine-member panel of clinicians and researchers evaluated the 49 proposed QIs related to rehabilitation before and after TKA. Panelists independently rated the 49 candidate QIs on a 9-point Likert scale and discussed these QIs in an online meeting. After the meeting, the panelists independently re-rated the QIs, and QIs with a median score of 7 or higher and score of less than 3 by two or fewer panelists were adopted as the final QIs. In addition, a pilot practice test was conducted to assess the feasibility and applicability of the developed QIs by retrospectively analyzing the medical records at two hospitals.
resultsForty-nine candidate QIs were developed based on one set of QIs, nine practice guidelines, eight best practice recommendations, and 162 systematic reviews. Finally, 36 indicators, including two new ones, were adopted consensually by nine panelists. Among these 36 indicators, some had overlapping elements, so they were consolidated and organized into 24 indicators. The pilot test (n = 352) revealed a median QI performance of 86.1 (IQR, 56.1-100), with six QIs demonstrating performance levels below 10%. This low performance indicated that the proportion of patients receiving rehabilitation in accordance with the indicators was actually low.
conclusionsThis study developed 36 QIs for patients undergoing rehabilitation before and after TKA in Japan. Although their feasibility was confirmed at two facilities, future studies are warranted to measure the quality of care more comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.