Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045393›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2025

Perspectives on multisectoral accountability framework to end tuberculosis in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region: a mixed-methods study.

Yuliya Chorna, Ievgeniia-Galyna Lukash, Yuliia Kalancha, Lesia Tonkonoh, Marifat Abdullaeva, Malik Adenov, Mariia Chuprynska, Sayohat Hasanova, Oxana Ibragimova, Panagul Jazybekova and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yuliya ChornaTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ievgeniia-Galyna LukashTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Yuliia KalanchaTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Lesia TonkonohTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine. tonkonog@tbcoalition.eu.
Marifat AbdullaevaDepartments of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, Tajik National University, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan.
Malik AdenovNational Scientific Centre of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Mariia ChuprynskaTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Sayohat HasanovaJoint Infectious Disease Unit, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oxana IbragimovaKazakhstan Union of People Living with HIV, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Panagul JazybekovaNational Scientific Centre of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Nataliia KamenskaTB Europe Coalition, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Olya KlymenkoTBPeopleUkraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Iryna KoroievaThe National Council on TB and HIV/AIDS (Country Coordinating Mechanism, Ukraine), Joint Project of UNDP and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Lyubov KravetsThe National Council on TB and HIV/AIDS (Country Coordinating Mechanism, Ukraine), Joint Project of UNDP and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nataliia KryshtafovychRepublican Public Association Defeat Tuberculosis Together, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
Lucia PirtinaCenter for Health Policies and Studies (PAS Center), Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Alena SkrahinaRepublican Research and Practical Center for Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
Yana TerleevaTB Management and Counteraction Department, Ministry of Health, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Valentina VilcInstitute of Phthisiopulmonology Chiril Draganiuc, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Hanna ZakrevskaCountry Coordinating Mechanism Secretariat, UNDP, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
Dmitry ZhurkinRepublican Research and Practical Center for Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.
James MalarCountry and Community Support for Impact, Stop TB Partnership Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amrita DaftaryDahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSectors beyond health are essential to combatting a social disease such as tuberculosis (TB). The engagement of the community and civil society sector in Eastern Europe and Central Asia was assessed as part of a broader baseline assessment of multisectoral engagement in national TB responses.

methodsThis was a mixed-methods community-based study. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were conducted online with TB-engaged community and civil society representatives in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, and Ukraine from January to June 2021. Quantitative data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, were triangulated with thematic qualitative analysis. A multisectoral accountability framework and community, rights, and gender framework for TB were used to triangulate the findings and inform data interpretations.

resultsParticipants (n = 160) included leads, service providers from 74 organizations, and TB survivors. Of 53 survey respondents, most (n = 41, 77·4%) indicated strong/complete agreement to participating in TB service delivery and gender, stigma, and/or legal assessments (n = 27, 50·9%) and research processes (n = 30, 56·6%). However, few indicated inclusion in operational planning and budgeting (n = 13, 24·5%), or political and program impact of community-led monitoring (n = 16, 30·2%), and almost none (n = 2, 3.8%) confirmed dedicated budgets for their TB-related work. Inquiry into the dimensions and criteria for multisectoral actions and accountability revealed their key, yet limited, role in attending to social determinants, with wider engagement hindered by precarious funding. Several organizations balanced building partnerships with other sectors engaged in the TB response against advocacy activities. Inherent obligations toward TB-affected communities were at times overshadowed by obligations to donors and state actors. Coordinating bodies for donor funds, which were multisectoral by design, presented an opportunity to bolster accountability actions within the TB response.

conclusionsMultisectoral engagement and accountability for TB are a laudable and necessary goal to end TB. Sustainable mechanisms to support the meaningful involvement of TB-affected communities and civil society are needed, particularly in the context of donor transitions.

Indexed as

AccountabilityCivil society engagementCommunity perspectivesDonor relationsMAF-TB assessmentMultisectoral collaborationQualitative methodsSurveyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40045393
PMCPMC11884184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.