Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045382›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

The role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence among Indigenous peoples in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: a scoping review.

Robert Martell, Maurianne Reade, Lisa Boesch, Davinder P Kaur, Sandeep Kumar, Michael McArthur, Marion A Maar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Indigenous Epidemic Folk Stories in Shaping Adaptive Disease-Related Behaviors in West Papua.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert MartellSchool of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Maurianne ReadeClinical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Lisa BoeschHuman Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Davinder P KaurPostgraduate Medical Education, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Sandeep KumarPostgraduate Medical Education, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Michael McArthurHealth Sciences Library, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Marion A MaarHuman Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. mmaar@nosm.ca.

Funding

CIHR #VC1-178871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany Indigenous youth and young adults in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand have reported low vaccine confidence, which has been linked to lower vaccination rates for COVID-19, MMR, HPV, DTaP-IPV-Hib, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Narrative-based health promotion approaches, including those focused on strengthening vaccine confidence, have been used in public health interventions. Scoping reviews have become increasingly valued for their rigorous and reproducible exploration of evidence in public health research. The aim of this scoping review was to understand the extent and types of evidence related to the facilitators, challenges, and benefits of narrative-based health promotion approaches in vaccine confidence interventions within Indigenous populations.

methodsThis review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for scoping reviews using Covidence online software to streamline the review process. Database searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed, as well as Google search to identify both academic and gray literature articles on the role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence published between January 2000 and April 2024. Charted data were ranked in a numerical summary and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The review process embraced a two-eyed seeing approach.

resultsThe searches identified 306 records. After the screening process, 45 sources (35 peer-reviewed articles, eight gray literature, and two preprint articles) were included in the final review. The key facilitators of narrative-based approaches to promote vaccine confidence were community engagement, tailored and culturally safe interventions, and trusted messengers and sources of information. The challenges discussed in the literature were linked to mistrust of government and healthcare services and to misinformation narratives. The most frequently reported benefits were the development of community-based resources, culturally safe and relevant interventions, building trust and respectful relationships, and improved vaccination rates.

conclusionThis review confirmed the important contribution of narrative-based health promotion approaches in strengthening vaccine confidence among Indigenous populations. This finding underscores the importance of respecting Indigenous sovereignty and engaging community perspectives to repair trust and improve vaccination rates.

Indexed as

Health PromotionIndigenous PeoplesNarrationVaccinationAustraliaCanadaCOVID-19HumansNew ZealandUnited StatesCultural safetyHealth promotionIndigenous populationsNarrativesStorytellingTwo-eyed seeingVaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID40045382
PMCPMC11884110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.