Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045348›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Experience sampling method studies in physical activity research: the relevance of causal reasoning.

Louise Poppe, Annick L De Paepe, Benedicte Deforche, Delfien Van Dyck, Tom Loeys, Jelle Van Cauwenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise PoppeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Annick L De PaepeDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Delfien Van DyckDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. delfien.vandyck@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1783-9075
Tom LoeysDepartment of Data-Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jelle Van CauwenbergSchool of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12ZF122NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek W001721NMRF MR/W002388/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe experience sampling method (ESM), also known as ecological momentary assessment, is gaining popularity in physical activity research. This method involves assessing participants' behaviors and experiences repeatedly over time. One key advantage of ESM is its ability to temporally separate the dependent and independent variable of interest, reducing the risk of reverse causality. However, temporal separation alone is insufficient for establishing causality. This methodology paper illustrates the importance of the identification phase in drawing causal conclusions from ESM data. In the identification phase the causal effect of interest (or estimand) is specified and the assumptions under which a statistical association can be considered as causal are visualized using causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).

methodsWe demonstrate how to define a causal estimand and construct a DAG for a specific ESM research question. The example focuses on the causal effect of physical activity performed in real-life on subsequent executive functioning among older adults. The DAG development process combines literature review and expert consultations to identify time-varying and time-invariant confounders.

resultsThe developed DAG shows multiple open backdoor paths causing confounding bias, even with temporal separation of the exposure (physical activity) and outcome (executive functioning). Two approaches to address this confounding bias are illustrated: (1) physical control using the within-person encouragement design, where participants receive randomized prompts to perform physical activity in their natural environment, and (2) analytic control, involving assessing all confounding variables and adjusting for these variables in the analysis phase.

conclusionsImplementing the identification phase enables ESM researchers to make more informed decisions, thereby enhancing the validity of causal inferences in studies aimed at answering causal questions.

Indexed as

CausalityEcological Momentary AssessmentExerciseResearch DesignAgedExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleCausalityDirected acyclic graphEcological momentary assessmentExperience sampling methodIdentificationWithin-person encouragement design

Identifiers

PMID40045348
PMCPMC11884166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.