ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
The use and experience of the national disability insurance scheme for Australians with skeletal dysplasia: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkeletal dysplasias are rare disorders affecting bone growth and development that impact functional performance. In Australia, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was rolled out in 2016 to support individuals with disabilities access reasonable and necessary supports to promote independence and quality of life. Anecdotally, Australians with skeletal dysplasias report challenges with accessing and using the NDIS but this has not previously been reported in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to explore the use and experience of NDIS for Australians with skeletal dysplasias.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. Eligible participants included adults and children (represented by their parents) with skeletal dysplasias, irrespective of NDIS access. Participants completed an online survey, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), or WeeFIM for paediatric participants, and semi-structured interviews exploring their NDIS access, use, and experience. Survey responses and FIM/WeeFIM results were analysed using descriptive statistics. Grounded theory approach and inductive thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data.
resultsOf the 14 participants (10 adults, 4 parents), nine (64%) had NDIS access. Six (66.7%) participants with access reported to be satisfied with their NDIS experience, two (22.2%) extremely satisfied, and one (11.1%) neutral. FIM (median 115.5/126, range 104-125) and WeeFIM (median 95.5/126, range 61-124) demonstrated all participants utilised assistance and/or equipment in daily activities. Three key themes identified through interviews: (1) Consistent, process-driven barriers, (2) Inconsistent, person-driven facilitators, and (3) Impact of NDIS.
conclusionDespite all participants demonstrating a need for assistance to achieve functional independence, experience and success in accessing the NDIS were varied. Both positive and negative impacts were reported when accessing, or attempting to access the NDIS. To promote more equal and equitable NDIS access for individuals with skeletal dysplasias, NDIS and condition-specific knowledge is recommended for all stakeholders. Finally, further evaluation is needed to ensure future NDIS eligibility changes provide access to those who are potentially eligible but currently rejected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.