ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessment of first-year medical student perceptions in the development of self-directed learning skills in a single medical school course.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Helpful if "Medication took up more space in the course!" - a mixed methods study about pharmacotherapeutic knowledge and digital quizzes for learning and assessment in the medical programme.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Training medical students' diagnostic reasoning skills using multivariate analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Tracking Clinical Competency Growth: A Longitudinal Study of Medical Students in a Multidisciplinary Emergency Department Internship Program.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Self-Assessment in Medical Student Communication Performance.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-directed learning (SDL) is a form of education in which learners take charge of their own learning process, with an active role in knowledge, skill and attitude acquisition. Developing SDL skills is essential to becoming a lifelong learner, which is necessary in the current climate of rapidly expanding medical knowledge. Students must also develop the ability to reflect on their own strengths and weaknesses in SDL-related skills, allowing them to set appropriate learning goals and identify areas that require further improvement. Critical Reasoning Exercises (CREs), a student-driven, problem-based learning course, was introduced for first year medical students at New York Medical College School of Medicine to ensure all steps of the SDL cycle were covered in a comprehensive and standardized way. As part of the formative assessment process for CREs, we developed and validated a five-item self-reporting rubric of SDL competency to aid students' self-assessment of their acquisition of SDL skills. The increase in student self-assessed total score from midpoint to endpoint of CREs was statistically significant (p < .001), indicating students' perceived increase in SDL competency by the end of the CRE course. In addition to the total score, there was a significant perceived increase in competency for four of the five component skills of SDL (p < .05). Interestingly, there was also a statistically significant difference in student self-assessment total scores among facilitator groups at the midpoint of the CRE course. Integration of CREs into the curriculum demonstrated potential as an effective educational intervention for medical student development of competency in SDL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.