Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045316›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Factors influencing obstetricians' acceptance of termination of pregnancy beyond the first trimester: a qualitative study.

Fien De Meyer, Kenneth Chambaere, Sarah Van de Velde, Kristof Van Assche, Kim Beernaert, Sigrid Sterckx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fien De MeyerResearch Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Venusstraat 23, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium. fien.demeyer@uantwerpen.be.
Kenneth ChambaereEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah Van de VeldeCenter for Population, Family and Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kristof Van AsscheResearch Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Venusstraat 23, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium.
Kim BeernaertEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sigrid SterckxBioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

BOF Special Research Fund University of Antwerp DOCPRO 4, no. 37051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Belgium, termination of pregnancy after the first trimester is exclusively allowed on medical grounds. When faced with fetal or maternal health complications during pregnancy, patients typically turn to obstetricians for guidance on the diagnosis, prognosis, and available options. Patients' decisions and their actual access to termination of pregnancy can be profoundly influenced by the quality of this counselling and the willingness of professionals to present termination as an acceptable option. This paper aims to explore the factors influencing obstetricians' acceptance of TOP requests after the first trimester of pregnancy. We subsequently analyze these acceptance dynamics from a multidisciplinary angle, incorporating ethical perspectives and a socio-legal exploration into how the interviewed health professionals experience, interpret, and apply the law.

methodsWe conducted an interview study with 23 hospital obstetricians who had prior experience with termination of pregnancy decision-making beyond the first trimester in Flanders, Belgium. Interviews, on average, lasted 1h30 and followed a semi-structured format guided by a topic guide. The transcripts were coded with NVivo software and subsequently thematically analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team to provide a comprehensive understanding of obstetricians' acceptance of termination of pregnancy after the first trimester.

resultsObstetricians' acceptance of termination of pregnancy after the first trimester mainly depends on the presence of compelling clinical factors. Secondary factors, including patient/couple preferences, institutional and collegial processes, timing and viability, technical considerations, obstetricians' ethical and professional values, the wider background of the patient/couple, and perception of alternatives, could sway decisions in the absence of compelling clinical factors.

conclusionsSecondary factors help sway obstetricians' decisions in favor of or against termination of pregnancy after 12 weeks when a request is characterized by inconclusive clinical factors. The multifactorial acceptance dynamics of obstetricians illustrate the limits of a strong emphasis on fetal interest argumentation. Moreover, they exhibit a degree of divergence and complexity absent from the Belgian Abortion Law. The presented typology of factors could stimulate and guide debates on legal reform and the importance that should be attributed to various factors in professional decision-making on termination of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingObstetricsPhysiciansAdultBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObstetriciansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstQualitative ResearchDecision-makingFactorsFetal anomalyHealth professionalsTermination of pregnancyViability

Identifiers

PMID40045316
PMCPMC11881364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.