Observational studyRespiratory research2025
Multicentre, real-world data of next-generation computer-assisted vacuum aspiration thrombectomy in acute pulmonary embolism.
Observational study in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04879069 (Polish Multicenter Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams Outcomes Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Polish Multicenter Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams Outcomes Registry
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cancer-associated pulmonary embolism: a multicenter, prospective registry.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Observational
- Effects of Early Versus Delayed Mechanical Thrombectomy on Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Reperfusion Therapies vs. Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: The PRETHA Randomized Clinical Trial.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Intraprocedural Management of Pulmonary Embolism Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Treatment, and Ventilatory and Cardiac Support.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Smart Thrombosis Care: The Rise of Closed-Loop Diagnosis-to-Treatment Nano Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on interventional treatment of intermediate-high (and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) are limited. The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (CDMT) in a real-world PE patient population.
methodsThis multicenter, prospective registry enrolled PE patients treated with CDMT using the Lightning 12 System. The primary safety endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, procedure-related major bleeding, clinical deterioration, or bailout to another strategy. The primary efficacy outcomes included the reduction of pulmonary arterial pressures and change in the right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio 48 h after the CDMT. Multivariate regression analyzed characteristics associated with RV/LV improvement.
resultsOur analysis included 150 patients, 72% with intermediate-high PE and 28% with high-risk PE. Systemic thrombolysis was contraindicated in 33.3%, whereas in 4% it failed. There were 2% intraprocedural deaths (1.3% due to RV failure and 0.7% due to massive interstitial bleeding), with no more deaths during follow-up. In 0.7%, CDMT was converted to open surgery, and in 0.7%, bailout systemic thrombolysis and extracorporeal oxygenation support. Major bleedings occurred in 1.3% within 48 h post CDMT. Immediate hemodynamic improvements included a mean 11.3±10 mmHg (22.1%) drop in systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (p < 0.0001) and a median 0.33 (0.25-0.45), (25.2%) drop in RV/LV ratio (p < 0.0001 for paired values),
conclusionsAspiration thrombectomy with the Lightning 12 system characterizes an acceptable safety profile, substantial improvements in hemodynamic outcomes, and low mortality for patients with intermediate-high and high-risk PE.
trial registrationNCT04879069 - date of registration 04.05.2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.