Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045269›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Drivers and barriers to promoting self-care in individuals living with multiple long-term health conditions: a cross-sectional online survey of health and care professionals.

Susan Barber, Benedict Hayhoe, Sonia Richardson, John Norton, Manisha Karki, Austen El-Osta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan BarberDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. s.barber@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-9639
Benedict HayhoeDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6191
Sonia RichardsonDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9559-0222
John NortonDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Manisha KarkiSelf-Care Research Unit, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-8915
Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Research Unit, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-4938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-care is an important part of preventing unwarranted decline in poor health linked to multimorbidity and in maintaining or improving health. Health and social care professionals provide support for self-care, which can positively influence health and care outcomes. It is important to understand the extent to which they perceive their support to be effective and what barriers to its uptake and desired outcomes exist. This study investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of front-line staff in England concerning drivers and barriers to promoting self-care in service users with multimorbidity.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was administered via the Imperial College Qualtrics platform. Questions were asked about perceived drivers and barriers to promoting self-care in individuals with multimorbidity, including mental health. The quality of the survey was assessed by completing the Checklist for Reporting Results of internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

resultsExtant barriers associated with service-users' ability and opportunity for self-care identified by seventy H&SCPs in England were feelings of loneliness and social isolation (18.9%; n = 54) and mobility and access issues (14.3%; n = 41). The methods most commonly used to support self-care were social prescribing (18%; n = 55), helping service users monitor their symptoms (15.4%;n = 47), and referring to recognised programmes to support self-management (14.1%; n = 43). The factors most identified as positively affecting service users to self-care included knowledge and understanding about the benefits of self-care (92.5%; n = 62), support to improve limitations caused by a health condition (92.5% n = 62), and support to improve mental health and wellbeing (91% n = 61). Gaps in H&SCPs knowledge were reported, including how to improve practical interactions to sustain health seeking behaviours by service users (32.2%; n = 48), health coaching (21.5%; n = 32), and knowledge about effective self-care interventions (20.1%; n = 30). Most respondents (92.9%; n = 64) reported that the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for self-care, and 44.9%(n = 31) agreed that the pandemic had a positive impact on their ability to promote self-care among service users.

conclusionsSelf-care is important for service users who live with multimorbidity. H&SCPs identified loneliness, social isolation, mobility and access to services, and support in understanding or complying with a medical regimen as key obstacles to self-care for service users. Extant barriers identified by H&SCPs were associated with service users' ability and opportunity to sustain self-care, especially relating to feelings of loneliness and experiences of social isolation, mobility and access issues.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelMultimorbiditySelf CareAdultChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19MultimorbiditySelf-care

Identifiers

PMID40045269
PMCPMC11883917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.