ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Predicting circRNA-disease associations with shared units and multi-channel attention mechanisms.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- AGCECDA: attention-guided heterogeneous graph collaborative embedding for circRNA-drug sensitivity association prediction.BMC biology · 2026Article
- A model of multi-view contrastive hypergraph learning for predicting circRNA-disease associations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Circular RNA therapeutics: a new class of long-acting RNA medicines for oncology, immunology, and rare diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- THGC_MDA: a method for predicting the associations between mFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- MVHGCN: Predicting circRNA-disease associations with multi-view heterogeneous graph convolutional neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- CircZFR functions in cancer from molecular networks to precision therapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Decoding circRNA translation: challenges and advances in computational method development.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCircular RNAs (circRNAs) have been identified as key players in the progression of several diseases; however, their roles have not yet been determined because of the high financial burden of biological studies. This highlights the urgent need to develop efficient computational models that can predict circRNA-disease associations, offering an alternative approach to overcome the limitations of expensive experimental studies. Although multi-view learning methods have been widely adopted, most approaches fail to fully exploit the latent information across views, while simultaneously overlooking the fact that different views contribute to varying degrees of significance.
resultsThis study presents a method that combines multi-view shared units and multichannel attention mechanisms to predict circRNA-disease associations (MSMCDA). MSMCDA first constructs similarity and meta-path networks for circRNAs and diseases by introducing shared units to facilitate interactive learning across distinct network features. Subsequently, multichannel attention mechanisms were used to optimize the weights within similarity networks. Finally, contrastive learning strengthened the similarity features. Experiments on five public datasets demonstrated that MSMCDA significantly outperformed other baseline methods. Additionally, case studies on colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and nonsmall cell lung cancer confirmed the effectiveness of MSMCDA in uncovering new associations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data are available at https://github.com/zhangxue2115/MSMCDA.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.