ArticleObesity surgery2025
Determining the Importance of Lifestyle Risk Factors in Predicting Binge Eating Disorder After Bariatric Surgery Using Machine Learning Models and Lifestyle Scores.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolution of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Applications and Clinical Implications.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in bariatric surgery: a comprehensive systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Score for Stent Outcomes in Post-Bariatric Leak Management: The "Alexandria-Bari-Stent" Tool.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Incidence rate of alcohol use disorder and correlation between metabolic changes and addictive behavior in patients after sleeve gastrectomy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was conducted to assess the association between lifestyle risk factors (LRF) and odds of binge eating disorder (BED) 2 years post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) using lifestyle score (LS) and machine learning (ML) models.
methodsIn the current study, 450 individuals who had undergone LSG 2 years prior to participation were enrolled. BED was assessed using BES questionnaire. The collected data for LRF included smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity (PA), fruit and vegetable intake, overweight/obesity, and percentage excess weight loss (EWL%). ML models included: logistic regression (LG), KNN, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), SVM, XGBoost, and deep learning or artificial neurol network (ANN). Additionally, accumulative LRF was assessed using LS.
resultsOne hundred and twenty-two subjects (26.1%) met the criteria for BED 2 years after LSG. Participants who were in the highest quartile of the lifestyle score (nearly worst) had significantly three times higher odds of BED compared to the lowest quartile (nearly optimal) (p trend = 0.01). Furthermore, RF, LG, SVM, and ANN had the highest accuracy (about 75%) in predicting BED compared to other ML models (between 60 and 72%). Among the lifestyle risk factors, insufficient PA, lower vegetable consumption, a higher level of BMI, and lower EWL% were independently associated with BED (p < 0.05).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that poor lifestyle patterns are associated with the development of BED, in contrast to non-BED individuals. Given the prevalence of this disorder among LSG participants, lifestyle risk factors must receive special attention after BS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40045153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.