Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045113›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Characteristics of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: marked difference between busulfan and melphalan regimens.

Saki Ogura, Yoshihiko Soga, Hideaki Fujiwara, Rumi Miura, Ken-Ichi Matsuoka, Yoshinobu Maeda, Takuo Kuboki

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saki Ogura *Division of Dental Hygienist, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshihiko Soga *Division of Hospital Dentistry, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan. y_soga@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-1474
Hideaki FujiwaraDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Rumi MiuraDivision of Dental Hygienist, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Ken-Ichi MatsuokaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshinobu MaedaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Takuo KubokiDivision of Dental Hygienist, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to examine the effects of conditioning regimens on oral mucositis in haploidentical (haplo) donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy).

methodsThirty consecutive patients (male, 23; female, 7; 18-68 years, median, 59 years) undergoing haplo-HSCT with PTCy using one of three conditioning regimens-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)-melphalan (Mel); RIC-Busulfan (Bu); and myeloablative conditioning (MAC)-Bu-were enrolled in this study. Data on the WHO grade of oral mucositis (day - 7 to + 20) were collected retrospectively. The incidences of ulcerative and severe mucositis (Grade 2-4 and Grade 3-4, respectively) were compared between the three groups.

resultsUlcerative mucositis occurred in 0% (0/10) of patients in the RIC-Mel group, 57.1% (4/7) in the RIC-Bu group, and 100% (13/13) in the MAC-Bu group. The differences between the RIC-Mel and RIC-Bu groups and between the RIC-Bu and MAC-Bu groups were significant (all P < 0.05). Severe mucositis occurred in 57.1% (4/7) of patients in the RIC-Bu group and 100% (13/13) of patients in the MAC-Bu group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The rates of ulcerative mucositis (≥ grade 2) and of severe mucositis (≥ grade 3) were significantly higher in the MAC-Bu group than the RIC-Bu group on days 10, 13, 15, and 16 and on days 10, 14, 15, and 16, respectively (all P < 0.05).

conclusionThe risk of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with PTCy is highest with the MAC-Bu conditioning regimen, followed by RIC-Bu, and lowest with RIC-Mel.

Indexed as

BusulfanCyclophosphamideHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMelphalanStomatitisTransplantation ConditioningAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyeloablative AgonistsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBusulfanCyclophosphamideMelphalanMyeloablative AgonistsBusulfanHematopoietic cell transplantationMelphalanOral mucositisPosttransplant cyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID40045113
PMCPMC11882729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.