Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045110›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025

Radiomics of lung ventilation/perfusion tomographic imaging in pulmonary embolism diagnosis.

Yu-Shuang Liu, Lei Wang, Hao-Yu Song, Li Wang, Yuan-Hua Yang, Qi Yang, Juan-Ni Gong, Min-Fu Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Shuang Liu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8Th Gongtinanlu Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Lei Wang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hao-Yu SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8Th Gongtinanlu Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Li WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8Th Gongtinanlu Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yuan-Hua YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qi YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Juan-Ni GongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. juannigong2018@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4863-549X
Min-Fu YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8Th Gongtinanlu Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China. minfuyang@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-0541

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support ZYLX202105Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program BRWEP2024W112030102National Natural Science Foundation of China 62206187National Natural Science Foundation of China 82025018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model (named V/P-mics) to identify pulmonary embolism based on lung ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission tomography (V/P-SPECT) images.

methodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 260 patients from one hospital who underwent V/P-SPECT. Patients were randomly assigned to training and testing groups in a 7:3 ratio. We created an internal further validation group using data of an additional 35 patients from the same hospital, and an external further validation group using data of 30 patients from another hospital. We constructed 35 models and selected one for further optimization. The generalizability of V/P-mics was proven by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of the testing group, internal and external further validation groups. The diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of V/P-mics was compared with that of nuclear physicians.

resultsV/P-mics showed excellent generalizability, with no statistical difference in AUC among the testing, internal further validation, and external further validation groups (0.938 vs. 0.923 vs. 0.990, all P values > 0.05). The AUC of V/P-mics was close to that of the senior physician (0.923 vs. 0.975, P = 0.332), but significantly higher than the junior physician (0.923 vs. 0.725, P = 0.050). Furthermore, V/P-mics significantly shortened the diagnosis time as compared to the junior physician (100 ± 16 s vs. 240 ± 37 s, P = 0.001).

conclusionThe V/P-mics had good discrimination and generalizability and significantly shortened the diagnosis time for patients with pulmonary embolism. Of note, the model showed excellent interpretability.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLungPerfusion ImagingPulmonary EmbolismTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentilation-Perfusion RatioVentilation-Perfusion ScanAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPulmonary embolismRadiomicsSPECTVentilation/perfusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.