Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045095›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2025

Generalizable deep learning framework for 3D medical image segmentation using limited training data.

Tobias Ekman, Arthur Barakat, Einar Heiberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias EkmanDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. tobias.ekman88@gmail.com.
Arthur BarakatDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Einar HeibergDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Heart and Lung foundation 20230720Vetenskapsrådet 2021-04855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is a critical component in a wide range of clinical applications, enabling the identification and delineation of anatomical structures. This study focuses on segmentation of anatomical structures for 3D printing, virtual surgery planning, and advanced visualization such as virtual or augmented reality. Manual segmentation methods are labor-intensive and can be subjective, leading to inter-observer variability. Machine learning algorithms, particularly deep learning models, have gained traction for automating the process and are now considered state-of-the-art. However, deep-learning methods typically demand large datasets for fine-tuning and powerful graphics cards, limiting their applicability in resource-constrained settings. In this paper we introduce a robust deep learning framework for 3D medical segmentation that achieves high performance across a range of medical segmentation tasks, even when trained on a small number of subjects. This approach overcomes the need for extensive data and heavy GPU resources, facilitating adoption within healthcare systems. The potential is exemplified through six different clinical applications involving orthopedics, orbital segmentation, mandible CT, cardiac CT, fetal MRI and lung CT. Notably, a small set of hyper-parameters and augmentation settings produced segmentations with an average Dice score of 92% (SD = ±0.06) across a diverse range of organs and tissues.

Indexed as

3D printingArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40045095
PMCPMC11884210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.