ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Tumor burden score combined with AFP and PIVKA-II (TAP score) to predict the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after radical liver resection.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOur study aimed to combine the morphological behavior (tumor burden score, TBS) and the biological behavior (AFP and PIVKA-II) to predict the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection.
methodsA total of 1766 HCC patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1079) and the validation cohort (n = 687) with a ratio of 6:4. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The multivariable Cox regression model was established based on the variables screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify variables independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Constructing our prognostic score (TBS-LN(AFP + PIVKA-II) score, TAP score) based on regression coefficients and the predictive ability of the TAP score was compared with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage.
resultsThe TAP score had good performance in stratifying RFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) in the training cohort and the validation cohort. There still existed significant differences in the intergroup comparisons among three TAP score groups for RFS and OS in the training cohort and the validation cohort. In our LASSO-Cox regression model, the TAP score was independently associated with RFS and OS. The TAP score also outperformed the BCLC stage in predicting RFS (1, 2 and 3 years) and OS (1, 3 and 5 years).
conclusionsThe TAP score had good performance in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients after radical liver resection and was superior to the BCLC stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.