Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40045061›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2025

Prognostic value of routine blood biomarkers in 3-year survival of resectable colorectal cancer patients: a prognostic nomogram for clinical practice.

David Moro-Valdezate, José Martín-Arévalo, Coral Cózar-Lozano, Stephanie García-Botello, Leticia Pérez-Santiago, David Casado-Rodrigo, Carolina Martínez-Ciarpaglini, Noelia Tarazona, Vicente Pla-Martí

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David Moro-ValdezateDepartment of Surgery, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain. david.moro@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-8677
José Martín-ArévaloDepartment of Surgery, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain. martin_jose@gva.es.
Coral Cózar-LozanoColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Stephanie García-BotelloDepartment of Surgery, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Leticia Pérez-SantiagoColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
David Casado-RodrigoColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Carolina Martínez-CiarpagliniDepartment of Pathology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia. CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia TarazonaDepartment of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia. CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente Pla-MartíDepartment of Surgery, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop a prognostic model for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using biomarkers from routine preoperative peripheral blood examinations combined with clinical factors.

methodsThis observational study comprised CRC patients (stages I-III) who underwent curative surgery between January 2011 and December 2019. Study variables included patient demographics, tumour characteristics, and immune/inflammatory markers from preoperative blood tests. Cut-off thresholds for continuous variables were determined using maximally selected rank statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression models were developed and validated using a random split-sample approach. Nomograms based on these models were constructed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for 12, 24 and 36 months.

resultsA total of 764 patients were included. Independent factors for 3-year DFS included laparoscopic surgery, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and Charlson comorbidity index. The DFS prediction model showed AUC values of 66.6%, 64.8%, and 69% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For CSS, independent factors included age, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), serum albumin, and platelet count, with AUC values of 89.2%, 76.8%, and 71% for years 1, 2, and 3. The most significant contributors to the CSS model were SII and platelet cut-off values.

conclusionInflammatory biomarkers combined with clinical parameters robustly predict 3-year survival outcomes in CRC patients undergoing curative resection. These findings highlight the importance of systemic inflammation in CRC prognosis and support its inclusion in preoperative risk stratification.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsNomogramsAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorBlood biomarkersColorectal cancerPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40045061
PMCPMC11882633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.