ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia following minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- International expert consensus on the management of paraconduit herniation after esophagectomy: results of a two-round Delphi survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMinimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has emerged as the preferred surgical method for esophageal cancer resulting from lower morbidity rates for MIE compared to open surgery. However, post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH), also known as paraconduit hernia, once rare, is now increasingly observed as a late complication. This study aims to ascertain the prevalence, predictive factors, and surgical management of PEHH following MIE in esophageal cancer patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2013 and 2023. Patients with PEHH were identified through clinical presentation and CT scans and compared to those without PEHH using statistical tests. Variables with p-values less than 0.2 were subjected to multivariate analysis.
resultsAmong 371 patients, predominantly male with locally advanced disease (stages 2-4, 90.8%), 25 (6.7%) developed PEHH after a median interval of 24 months post-MIE. The PEHH group exhibited significantly lower BMI and shorter ICU stays. On multivariate analysis BMI < 25 kg/m2 (OR 2.96, CI 1.22-7.20, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (OR 0.67, CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PEHH. Surgical repair was performed in 84% of PEHH cases, with 60% symptomatic and 48% emergency surgery. The minimally invasive approach was implemented in 15 patients (71.4%). Primary repair was successfully conducted in 14 cases (66.7%), while mesh was used in one-third of patients.
conclusionThe increasing prevalence of PEHH with MIE warrants attention. A lower BMI and shorter ICU stay was associated with PEHH. Most cases are symptomatic and effectively managed through minimally invasive techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40045058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.