ArticleMemory & cognition2025
Examining the effects of mood and emotional valence on the creation of false autobiographical memories.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While generally reliable, human memory is susceptible to distortions such as false memories. This study investigates the relationships among the emotional valence of events, mood states, and the formation of false autobiographical memories, applying the blind implantation method. We examine the impact of positive and negative moods, combined with the emotional valence of events (negative vs. positive), on false belief and recollection ratings. We conducted two preliminary studies to develop an online mood induction and select critical and noncritical autobiographical events. In the main experiment, 715 adults completed a list of 20 autobiographical events. The participants who had not experienced certain critical events were invited to a second phase, resulting in a final sample of 242 participants (130 female, 108 male, and four others), aged 19-81 years (M = 40.35, SD = 12.64). After experiencing the mood induction, they were presented with a survey suggesting that they had previously reported experiencing a critical event. False beliefs and memories were implanted in 6% (n = 15) to 34% (n = 83) of the cases. While mood did not affect false belief and recollection ratings, negative events led to greater false belief and recollection than positive events did, aligning with the associative activation model and fuzzy-trace theory. These findings highlight the need for caution in settings (e.g., therapy), where possible suggestive techniques could inadvertently implant false traumatic memories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40045033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.