ArticleScientific reports2025
Prefabricated building construction in materialization phase as catalysts for hotel low-carbon transitions via hybrid computational visualization algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative assessing prefabricated and conventional 3D morphology carbon emission intensity of economy chain hotel buildings in Hangzhou.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Carbon reduction multidimensional ternary model for robotic 3D printing prefabricated construction across hotels star levels.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- AI enhancing prefabricated aesthetics and low carbon coupled with 3D printing in chain hotel buildings from multidimensional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the carbon emissions of star-rated hotels in Hangzhou, comparing the environmental impact of prefabricated construction (PC) and conventional construction (CC) methodologies. The research reveals that PC generally results in lower carbon emissions during the materialization phase, with notable variations across different hotel star levels and administrative regions. Higher-star hotels exhibit higher total emissions, primarily due to larger scale and reliance on conventional construction methods. In contrast, lower-tier hotels benefit more consistently from the adoption of prefabricated construction, leading to significant reductions in carbon emissions. Regional analysis shows that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hotel turnover and carbon decoupling trends varies, with core urban areas experiencing a more pronounced decoupling effect, while suburban regions exhibited slower recovery. The findings underscore the potential for prefabricated construction to reduce carbon footprints, particularly in mid-tier and lower-tier hotels. This study contributes to the understanding of sustainable construction practices in the hotel industry and provides a foundation for future research focused on refining carbon emission assessments, incorporating real-world data, and exploring the integration of renewable energy and lifecycle emissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.