ArticleScientific reports2025
Cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolving landscape of economic evaluations of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation strategies: a systematic review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Pooled it
- Interest in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use and associated factors among people who inject drugs in Iran: a nationwide survey in 2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Iranian government does not fund pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and it is not used in Iran due to uncertainties in its cost-effectiveness. In this study, we examined the cost-effectiveness of PrEP among female sex workers (FSWs) in Iran. The cost-effectiveness analysis compared only PrEP, a combination of PrEP with harm reduction (HR) with only HR scenario among FSWs over a 10-year time horizon. The perspective of the healthcare provider was used in the analysis. The primary outcome was disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Analyses included health and cost outcomes, as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was reported as the cost per DALY averted. Only PrEP was not cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 4669.6 USD per DALY averted in Iran. In contrast, PrEP and HR strategies were cost-effective at the same willingness to pay threshold. The ICER was 868.47 USD per DALY averted for PrEP and HR compared to HR alone. Compared to HR, combining PrEP with HR is a cost-effective intervention among Iranian FSWs for reducing the clinical and economic burden associated with HIV over a 10-year time horizon. Iran should add PrEP to current HR programs for FSWs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.