ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2025
Balneotherapy in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: protocol of "FIBROTHERM", a prospective multi-center, two-cohort observational study.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natural Sulfur Compounds in Mineral Waters: Implications for Human Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balneotherapy (BT) is considered an effective, non-pharmacological approach, in the multimodal treatment of the Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FS). However, the evidence of efficacy and tolerability of BT in FS is still limited. This is a prospective multi-center two-cohort observational study. The main aim will be the comparison of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (according to Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-FIQ) achievement in FS patients treated with BT vs standard care. Secondary objectives will be to assess: a) BT impact on pain, quality of life, anxiety and depression; b) the persistence of benefits in six weeks c) BT safety profile. All FS patients with a stable treatment in the past 3 months and a moderate to severe disease (FIQ score ≥ 39) will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Patients will be divided into two Cohort: a) BT Cohort (i.e., BT in addition to standard care)-BTC; b) Control Cohort (i.e., only standard care)-SCC. There will be three assessments: baseline, two and six weeks (i.e., one month after BT end in BTC). At each of them the subject will fill in the following questionnaires: FIQ, VAS pain, Short Form Health Survey 16, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. We expect to observe a more relevant improvement of disease activity in BTC than in SCC. The positive effect may extend even to pain, quality of life, anxiety and depression. The short- and medium-term effects are likely to be similar, without any significant warning in terms of tolerability. Collected data, deriving from a large sample of patients, will provide a new insight of BT role in moderate to severe FS treatment. In particular, it will be possible to quantify the short and medium-term BT impact on disease activity and secondary symptoms related to FS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.