ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025
Quantifying disturbance effects on ecosystem services in a changing climate.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Spatiotemporal differentiation and trade-off/synergy relationships of ecosystem service values in Mountain-Oasis-Desert System of Xinjiang Aksu region.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plant Functional Traits or Microbiomes Associated with Diseases, Pests, Human Activities and Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disturbances, such as hurricanes, fires, droughts and pest outbreaks, can cause major changes in ecosystem conditions that threaten Nature's contributions to people (ecosystem services). Climate change is intensifying disturbances, posing risks to ecosystem services. To assess those risks, we develop a flexible, functional trait-based approach to quantify ecological, ecosystem service and economic impacts from disturbance regimes. Our broadly applicable approach integrates knowledge from disturbance ecology and ecosystem service valuation, and we highlight the pitfalls of using either perspective in isolation. We demonstrate our approach by quantifying impacts to timber and recreational enjoyment from extreme windstorms in a midlatitude forest. While we predict large potential losses to these services under historical and future disturbance regimes, common ecological metrics of compositional and biomass stability are inadequate for predicting these impacts. We then provide a roadmap for applying our approach across different social-ecological systems, illustrating the approach for crop pollination, flood hazard mitigation and cultural values from coral reefs-which all face intensifying disturbances. This study highlights and provides tools to address the pressing need to consider disturbances in future ecosystem service assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40044951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.