ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting workability and mechanical properties of bentonite plastic concrete using hybrid ensemble learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable prediction of dynamic compressive strength of red sandstone under wetting-drying cycles using ensemble learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- Durability and service life prediction of fly ash based geopolymer high performance concrete under extreme environmental conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rheology, strength and durability performance of bentonite-enhanced high-performance concrete.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metal contamination in wastewater poses severe environmental challenges, highlighting the urgent need for efficient and cost-effective solutions. While bentonite incorporation in concrete mixtures has shown promise in adsorbing heavy metals, its experimental validation-through Bentonite Plastic Concrete (BPC)-is hindered by high costs, labor-intensive procedures, and the need for specialized equipment. This study overcomes these barriers by introducing hybrid ensemble learning models, optimized with Forensic-Based Investigation Optimization (FBIO), to predict BPC's workability and mechanical properties, including slump (S), tensile strength (TS), and elastic modulus (E). Using input parameters such as gravel, bentonite, silty clay, curing time, sand, cement, and water, models including Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting (ADB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT) were developed. Notably, GBRT-FBIO achieved the highest accuracy for E predictions, while XGB-FBIO excelled for TS and S. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis identified water as the most critical factor influencing slump (+ 0.11) predictions while curing time emerged as the key determinant for TS (+ 0.18) and E (+ 0.12) predictions. Additionally, a user-friendly online tool was developed to enable the real-time application of these models, reducing reliance on costly experimental methods. This work addresses key challenges in experimental BPC testing, offering a transformative computational approach for advancing civil engineering materials research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.