ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Optimizing infertility treatment for ovarian endometrioma: is surgical intervention preferable before or after in-vitro fertilization programs?
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndometriosis is one of the common endometrial pathologies that occurs in reproductive-age women and could lead to infertility. This study set out to observe which clinical management of endometriosis with endometrioma is prominent in improving IVF outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional controlled study at Bunda General Hospital and Morula IVF Jakarta Clinic, Indonesia from Jan 2018 to Dec 2022. A total of 279 patients diagnosed with endometriosis were recorded. Of that, 86 couples with endometrioma underwent an in vitro fertilization program (IVF). Forty-eight women performed IVF prior to the removal of endometrioma through surgery (IVF-OPS) while the remaining underwent surgery for endometrioma removal followed by an IVF program (OPS-IVF). Each group was compared to the control group which was administered to an IVF program without the removal of endometriosis. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis and Chi square were used for statistical analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA comparable clinical pregnancy rate was observed across the three groups (p = 0.068). Nonetheless, the IVF-OPS approach led to an improved number of top-quality blastocysts compared to both the control and OPS-IVF groups (p < 0.05). Eventually, IVF-OPS was shown to be a prominent approach for endometriosis with endometrioma management in comparison to OPS-IVF in terms of clinical pregnancy rate as well as embryology laboratory outcomes (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur result suggested that intervention of endometriosis with removal surgery was superior when performed after the IVF program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.