ArticleScientific reports2025
The stakeholder game mechanisms in land use change of Caohai National Nature Reserve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the decision-making mechanisms of stakeholders in land use changes within wetland areas is critical for managing land resources effectively and mitigating conflicts. This study applies a game-theoretic approach to examine the strategic interactions among key stakeholders-managers, developers, and residents-within the Caohai National Nature Reserve (CNNR) in China. By integrating real data on land use changes, ecological quality indices, and economic incentives, this study identifies the driving forces behind stakeholder behavior and land use evolution from 2000 to 2020. The land use changes and ecological effects in the CNNR can be divided into two main stages: From 2000 to 2010, the primary direction of land use change was the conversion of grassland into construction land and farmland, resulting in the deterioration of ecological environment quality. From 2010 to 2020, the main direction of land use change shifted to the conversion of farmland into grassland and forest land, leading to an improvement in ecological environment quality. Game-theoretic analysis demonstrates that managers play a decisive role in shaping stakeholder strategies through regulatory mechanisms, such as land rent adjustments, penalties, subsidies, and ecological compensation. Stronger enforcement of penalties and incentives significantly enhances cooperative behavior among stakeholders, reducing land use conflicts and promoting ecological recovery. These findings emphasize the necessity of targeted governance strategies to align stakeholder interests and balance ecological conservation with socio-economic development. The insights from this study provide valuable guidance for policymakers and land managers in designing effective land use policies and improving conservation efforts in wetland-protected areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.