Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044882›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Wearable ECG patch monitoring for 72 h is comparable to conventional Holter monitoring for 24 h to detect cardiogenic vertigo.

Hyun Ah Kim, Hyung Lee, Hyoung-Seob Park, Jinhee Ahn, Suk-Min Lee, Seo-Young Choi, Eun Hye Oh, Jae-Hwan Choi, Ji-Yun Park, Kwang-Dong Choi

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hyun Ah KimDepartment of Neurology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Hyung LeeDepartment of Neurology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Hyoung-Seob ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jinhee AhnDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Suk-Min LeeDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea.
Seo-Young ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea.
Eun Hye OhDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jae-Hwan ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ji-Yun ParkDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Kwang-Dong ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Korea. kdchoi@pusan.ac.kr.

Funding

Biomedical Research Institute Grant by the Pusan National University Hospital 202100130001The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by the Korean government (MSIT) RS-2023-NR076583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to compare the diagnostic efficacy of a 72-hour wearable electrocardiography (ECG) patch monitoring with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitoring for the detection of cardiogenic vertigo. We conducted a prospective multicenter study that recruited 47 patients suspected of cardiogenic vertigo in four referral-based university hospitals between November 2019 and April 2022. Patients received simultaneous ambulatory ECG recordings using a 72-hour wearable ECG patch monitoring and a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor. The primary outcome was the detection rate of arrhythmia events during the entire wearing period. The secondary outcomes included device preference and factors affecting the detection of cardiogenic vertigo. During the 72-hour monitoring period, there was no significant difference in the overall detection rate of arrhythmia events between the wearable patch and conventional Holter monitoring (10 of 47 [21.3%] vs. 8 of 47 [17.0%], p = .500) Most patients (46/47) favored a wearable patch over Holter monitoring. The effectiveness of wearable ECG patch monitoring was comparable to conventional Holter monitoring in detecting cardiogenic vertigo. With its extended monitoring capability and patient preference, wearable patch monitoring holds promise as an alternative method for the diagnosis of cardiogenic vertigo. Limitations of this study include small sample size and selection bias.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryVertigoWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedArrhythmias, CardiacFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40044882
PMCPMC11883029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.