Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044844›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pharmacovigilance analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related reproductive adverse effects based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Bahadır Köylü, Buğra Han Esen, Şevval Nur Bektaş, Laşin Özbek, Volkan Turan, Bülent Urman, Özgür Öktem, Fatih Selçukbiricik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cancer survivorship in malignant melanoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bahadır KöylüDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. bkoylu@ku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-6393
Buğra Han EsenKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şevval Nur BektaşKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Laşin ÖzbekKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Volkan TuranIstanbul Health and Technology University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bülent UrmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Özgür ÖktemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. ooktem@ku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-3886
Fatih SelçukbiricikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on the female and male reproductive systems. In the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, adverse reactions under the "Reproductive system and breast disorders" category in the System Organ Classes were included, covering a period from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2023. We identified 133,512 patients treated with ICIs. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related reproductive adverse effects (irRAEs) were reported in 568 (0.43%) patients. Spermatogenesis abnormality (ROR025 = 7.91) had the highest signal strength associated with ICI use in males. Genital tract fistula was the only significant irRAE (ROR025 = 2.72) in females. PD-1 inhibitors pose greater risk than CTLA-4 inhibitors (OR = 1.65 [1.05-2.79], p = 0.045). Gynecologic cancers in females (OR = 3.77 [2.82-4.99], p < 0.0001) and urogenital cancers in males (OR = 1.56 [1.17-2.06], p = 0.0018) carried the highest risk compared to other cancers. Additional targeted drugs (OR = 2.32 [1.76-3.02], p < 0.0001), particularly lenvatinib (OR = 3.50 [2.48-4.94], p < 0.0001) and cabozantinib (OR = 3.71 [1.96-7.03], p < 0.0001) significantly increased the risk for females. Additional use of chemotherapy drugs was associated with a significant reduction in the risk for males (OR = 0.65 [0.42-0.96], p = 0.042) except for doxorubicin (OR = 2.58 [1.22-5.47], p = 0.013) and cyclophosphamide (OR = 2.36 [1.05-5.29], p = 0.038). This study demonstrates that ICIs could potentially lead to a wide range of adverse effects in the reproductive system in both males and females.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPharmacovigilanceAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsFemale genital systemImmune checkpoint inhibitorMale genital systemNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40044844
PMCPMC11883018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.