ArticleScientific reports2025
SH-SSQ as a modifier for superior mechanical properties and improved plasticity of 3D printed PLA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- POSS-based hybrid biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Composite Filament Materials for 3D-Printed Drone Parts: Advancements in Mechanical Strength, Weight Optimization and Embedded Electronics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work confirms that the use of silisequioxanes in the modification of polymeric and composite materials to change their properties is possible in the range of low modifier concentrations, not exceeding 2.5%. This study investigates the impact of (3-thiopropyl)polysilsesquioxane (SSQ-SH) on the properties of polylactide (PLA) for 3D printing. Microscopic analysis using SEM and EDS mapping proved that SSQ-SH is well dispersed in the polymer matrix in the concentration range of 0.25-2.5 wt%, agglomerations were observed at 5 wt% concentration, which reduces the homogeneity of the material and is also reflected in the mechanical test results. Mechanical testing shows SSQ-SH enhances flexibility and toughness, with the most significant improvements observed at 1 wt% and 1.5 wt% concentrations. Specifically, elongation at break increases by up to 56% and impact strength by up to 37% compared to unmodified PLA. These results suggest SSQ-SH is an effective plasticizer, improving interlayer adhesion and reducing brittleness. The optimal SSQ-SH concentrations for maximizing mechanical performance and material integrity are 1 wt% and 1.5 wt%. Part of the produced samples was conditioned in a climatic chamber, it was observed based on DSC and XRD analysis that the crystallinity of the materials significantly increases after exposure to UV radiation, which is also confirmed by microscopic observations. This study highlights the potential of SSQ-SH in improving the performance of 3D printed PLA materials and efficient modification is possible even in the range of low modifier concentrations, not exceeding 2.5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.