Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Environmental regulation, coal de-capacity, and PM2.5 in China.

Qian Zhang, Yanran Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qian ZhangSchool of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing, China.
Yanran ChenSchool of Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing, China. yanran.chen@cueb.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72203153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines how the removal of excess coal production capacity has affected the air quality in China. A coal de-capacity policy, including a reduction in coal, downscaling of the pollution in mines, and strict regulation of coal production, was implemented in 2016. However, until now studies have paid little attention to the effects of coal de-capacity on air pollution. Using panel data from 294 cities covering from 2014 to 2020, we employed a continuous Differences-in-Differences (DID) method to show that coal de-capacity significantly reduces Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5). This finding is robust to using alternative indicators, Instruments Variable (IV) and the Propensity Score Matching with Differences-in-Differences (PSM-DID) method. The heterogeneity analysis suggests that the coal de-capacity policy has a larger effect on eastern, northern cities, and those with higher initial PM2.5 and a heavier industrial base. The PM2.5 deduction is caused by cleaning coal production under the coal de-capacity. These findings provide new knowledge on the environmental benefits of coal de-capacity and demonstrate the environmental benefits of Chinese supply-side reformation.

Indexed as

Air pollution controlCoal de-capacityCoal overcapacityDifference-in-difference

Identifiers

PMID40044799
PMCPMC11882947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.