Observational studyScientific reports2025
Evaluating suturing skill improvement for pediatric minimally invasive esophageal anastomosis model: an observational cohort study based on simulator training.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical Skill Acquisition in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery: Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Simulator for Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the enhancement of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suturing skills through intensive simulator training, to compare various experimentally measured movement parameters with the established scoring system and to identify movement parameters that may be crucial for achieving proficiency. 55 participants of the intensive practical course of endoscopic surgery in children were included. Training commenced with daily single surgical knot practice, progressed to executing on the final day an anastomosis resembling those performed in esophageal atresia repair. The training effectiveness was gauged by the successful completion of anastomosis. Skills were evaluated by simulator equipped with specialized sensors, which converted data into a set of instrument movement parameters. Additionally, two researchers assessed skills using recorded videos and the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) questionnaire. Significant improvements in single surgical knot proficiency were noted each day, specifically in metrics: time, movement economy, smoothness, acceleration, instrument activity, and overall score. Strong correlation was observed between automated and human assessments. 48/55 participants attempted anastomosis on the final day, among whom 70% (34/48) attained success (median score 5.1/10, only 16.7% scored above 7/10). Movement economy and instrument distance covered emerged as the most relevant predictors of the anastomosis success. Intensive simulation training significantly enhances endoscopic suturing skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.