ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi objective optimization framework for smart parking using digital twin pareto front MDP and PSO for smart cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Edge based distributed framework for real time hazard detection and road safety in smart transportation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FLPSO-AMPS: an optimized WSN model for air quality monitoring in tier-2 smart cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging hybrid deep learning with starfish optimization algorithm based secure mechanism for intelligent edge computing in smart cities environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A lightweight framework to secure IoT devices with limited resources in cloud environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Digital twin-driven management strategies for logistics transportation systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart cities are designed to improve the quality of life by efficiently using resources and smart parking is an important part of this puzzle to help alleviate traffic congestion and efficiently address energy consumption and search time for parking spaces. However, existing parking management systems have issues with resource management, system scalability, and real-time dynamic changes. In response to these challenges, this paper proposes a Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Smart Parking incorporating Digital Twin Technology, Pareto Front Optimization, Markov Decision Process (MDP), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Hence, the proposed framework utilizes Digital Twin whereby there is a generation of a virtual model of the existing parking infrastructure that can give a real-time prospective estimation of the entire system. The Pareto Front is then used for multi-objective optimization of the search domain, where the goal is to minimize the search time, use of energy, and traffic disruption, and maximize the availability of parking spaces. The MDP splits the resource allocation problem into a value function which can then model the real-time parking requests. Further, PSO refines the solutions found from the Pareto front for a globally superior distribution. The framework is evaluated using extensive simulations across multiple metrics: search time, energy, congestion level, scalability, and utilization. Evaluation outcomes also show that the proposed algorithm is better than Round Robin, Random Allocation, and Threshold Based algorithms in terms of 25% improvement in the search time, 18% better energy usage, and 30% less traffic congestion. This work has shown the prospects of combining hybrid optimization and real-time decision-making in the enhancement of parking management in smart cities for better efficiency in urban mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.