ArticleScientific reports2025
Blood predictive biomarkers for cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence-Based Strategies for Addressing Cancer- and Treatment-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Review.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio in the relationship between occupational aluminum exposure and cognitive function impairment: a mediation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence, associated factors and impact of mild cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults with Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a common health problem. However, it is often ignored in primary healthcare due to complex examination. To develop biomarkers through easily accessible blood tests, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis including 2806 healthy Chinese adults aged over 60 years old who finished the cognition assessment though Mini-Mental State Examination as well as blood routine and biochemical examination from four communities in China between July 2020 and September 2021. The blood biomarkers commonly selected by RFE and LASSO with cross-validation in the training dataset were levels of hemoglobin, high density lipoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, direct bilirubin, globulin, creatinine, magnesium, and calcium. We developed XGBoost, logistic regression and SVM models with cross-validation in the training dataset and then evaluated their performance by the receiver operating characteristic curves, F1 score and decision curve analysis in the test dataset. The accuracies of the eight biomarkers in XGBoost, logistic regression and SVM models were 0.880 (0.846-0.915), 0.851 (0.812-0.889), and 0.852 (0.814-0.890) with confirmed clinical utility to predict cognitive impairment separately. Cognitive impairment can be predicted based on blood routine and biochemical examination with good discrimination, which could be helpful in detection and intervention at primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.