ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction and validation of a nomogram based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict the prognosis of T1 gastric cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram integrating multidimensional lymph node indicators with clinicopathological factors predicts overall survival in non-metastatic gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of PLN, LNR, and LODDS in advanced colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Survival outcomes in early gastric cancer: evidence from SEER-based population studies.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Optimizing gastric cancer treatment: the role of LODDs in lymph node staging.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of LODDS in late-onset gastric adenocarcinoma: analysis of SEER, TCGA, and external multicenter cohorts.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In patients with gastric cancer (GC), metastatic progression through the lymphatic, haematogenous, peritoneal, and ovarian routes is the ultimate cause of death. We developed a nomogram to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with T1 gastric cancer based on log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). A total of 2,221 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were split into training and internal validation cohorts, while an external validation cohort included 165 patients from our hospital. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, sex, tumour size, LODDS score, and M stage were independent prognostic factors for CSS. The LODDS outperformed the N stage and positive lymph node (PLN) count in terms of predictive ability and is recognised as an independent prognostic factor for nomogram construction. In the training and internal and external validation sets, the 1-year AUCs of the columniogram were 0.732, 0.672, and 0.719, respectively. The 3-year AUCs were 0.705, 0.692, and 0.638, respectively. The 5-year AUCs were 0.726, 0.698, and 0.713, respectively, indicating good predictive power. The calibration curve revealed that the predicted survival rate was consistent with the actual survival rate in the three groups. The ROC and DCA demonstrated that the nomogram has more potential in predicting prognosis than the existing AJCC staging system. We constructed and validated a novel nomogram leveraging LODDS, which effectively estimates the CSS at 1, 3, and 5 years for individuals with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.