ArticleScientific reports2025
Microbiota shifts in fracture-related infections and pathogenic transitions identified by 16S rDNA sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcome After Surgery for Fracture-Related Infection Is Dependent on Both Microbiology and the Host Inflammatory Response.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between periodontitis and fracture-related infection in patients with severe open fractures of the upper and/or lower extremities.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a major challenge in orthopaedic trauma. Understanding of the microbial shift with respect to the initial contamination to infection phase is crucial. This study was to examine the wound microbiota associated with FRI in a prospective cohort study of 155 patients with Gustilo-Anderson Type II, IIIA or IIIB open fractures. Tissue samples were systematically collected from all patients during initial surgical debridement. Out of these, patients who developed infection (FRI group, n = 28) had a second tissue sampling during re-debridement. Conversely, patients who achieved normal healing and subsequently received definitive open reduction and internal fixation served as control (NH group, n = 24). Marked differences between all groups were revealed in the 16S rDNA analysis of microbial communities. The species richness was higher in the Pre-FRI group, but bacterial diversity declined significantly in the FRI group after infection onset. In the Pre-FRI and Pre-NH groups, Firmicutes were the dominating phylum, while in the FRI and NH groups, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria appeared more prevalent, respectively. In Pre-FRI notably abundant Bacillus and Staphylococcus and in FRI, the most pathogens were Enterobacter and Pseudomonas. The NH group maintained balanced microbial diversity. These findings suggest that declining microbiota diversity and shifts towards dominant pathogens in open fracture patients may serve as early indicators of infection risk, with Bacillus potentially emerging as a predictive biomarker for FRI susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.