Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044710›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental performance examination of a coherence technique-based numerical differential current relay for AC machine stator windings protection.

R A Mahmoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R A MahmoudDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines Engineering (PME), College of Engineering Science & Technology, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST), 6th of October City, Giza, Egypt. ragab.mahmoud@must.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A computational technique based on a coherence method for fault detection and classification for electrical machine stator windings is presented in this article. The coherence algorithm can identify clearly and concisely inter-turn and shunt faults situated on the 3-phase stator windings of the AC machine. Besides, it can categorize the different types of internal shunt faults. The cross-coherence algorithm performs the functional role of digital differential current to find and classify the internal faults; while, the auto-coherence algorithm acts as an overcurrent detector to define the occurrence of external, internal, or inter-turn faults. A new setup of three-phase induction machine stator windings, where each winding is re-winded to produce 20 taps per phase, is used to examine the approach. The new design is intended to build current transformers at the neutral and supply sides of the three windings, and to simplify conducting comprehensive examinations to verify the efficacy and efficiency of the advanced algorithm. The protection characteristics of the developed algorithm will be analyzed and estimated using the new setup. The test results indicate that the reliability and accuracy of the protection are above 98.7%. The coherence criterion is also useful for monitoring electrical faults, sensing inter-turn faults, distinguishing between external and internal shunt faults, classifying diverse internal shunt faults within the equipment protection zone, and estimating the tripping time when inter-turn faults occur. Furthermore, a new design of protection tripping-characteristic curves is established, and the time response of the computational technique is fast.

Indexed as

AC machineCoherence criterionDifferential current relayElectrical faultsFault classificationInter-turn faults

Identifiers

PMID40044710
PMCPMC11882915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.