Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Study on spatial pattern and coupling of county traffic superiority degree and new-type urbanization level in Guizhou Province, China.

Yuanyuan Yang, Yao Yao

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuanyuan YangSchool of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, 550014, China.
Yao YaoSchool of public management, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, 500025, China. yyy@cug.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall level of transportation infrastructure and the level of new urbanization are two coupled systems that complement each other. The balanced development of a region benefits from the efficient synergy of these two systems. Using methods such as the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve, spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis, and models for evaluating traffic superiority and new urbanization levels, we analyzed the balance and spatial distribution characteristics of these two developments and their coupling coordination levels in 88 counties of Guizhou Province (GZP) in 2020. The results indicate that the transportation advantage level in Guizhou's counties shows a spatial distribution that decreases outward from regions with concentrated high-speed rail and highways. In contrast, the level of new urbanization is constrained by economic development disparities, exhibiting a distinct "dual-core" spatial differentiation with Guiyang's urban area as the main core and Zunyi and Renhuai as secondary cores. The average and maximum transportation advantage scores are higher than those of new urbanization, and the scores in higher-level development zones are superior to those in lower-level zones. Additionally, transportation advantage shows better balance compared to new urbanization. Both transportation advantage and new urbanization levels exhibit positive spatial autocorrelation, with similar hotspot areas but significantly different coldspot areas. The coordination between transportation advantage and new urbanization is relatively low, with 80.68% of counties not fully leveraging their transportation advantages. Accurately identifying the coordination phase and system state of these factors can provide valuable references for the future development of different counties.

Indexed as

Coupling coordination degreeGuizhou ProvinceSpatial patternThe new type of urbanization (NTU)Transportation advantage degree (TAD)

Identifiers

PMID40044685
PMCPMC11883036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.