Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044622›Full record

ReviewPediatric dermatology2025

Epidemiology of Pediatric Alopecia Areata.

Rutha Adhanom, Brandon Ansbro, Leslie Castelo-Soccio

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role ofJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rutha AdhanomNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Brandon AnsbroNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Leslie Castelo-SoccioNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3289-446X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This contemporary scoping narrative review examines the epidemiology of pediatric alopecia areata (AA), focusing on incidence, prevalence, racial and ethnic differences, and comorbidities. Articles containing original epidemiology on pediatric AA published between 2013 and 2024 were identified. From these studies, the estimated US child and adolescent incidence of AA is between 13.6 and 33.5 per 100,000 person-years, and the prevalence of AA is between 0.04% and 0.11%. Incidence and prevalence rates vary widely by geographic region and nation. A general pattern of highest estimated lifetime prevalence in North African and Middle Eastern nations, followed by high-income North American countries, then by Asian and Western European nations, and, lastly, by Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa emerged. Though infrequently reported, racial and ethnic differences were noted in the largest pediatric-specific studies: Hispanic/Latino, Black, and Asian children were affected by AA at higher rates compared to those who self-identify as White/Caucasian. AA carried a high burden of comorbidities, including atopic disease, vitiligo, mental illness, and thyroid conditions. The existing pediatric epidemiology can help identify potential disparities in care and guide additional research, advocacy, and policy.

Indexed as

Alopecia AreataAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityEthnicityGlobal HealthHumansIncidencePrevalencealopeciaalopecia areataalopecia totalisalopecia universalischildrenepidemiologyincidencepediatricprevalencerace

Identifiers

PMID40044622
PMCPMC11882485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.