ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Introducing the Novel Deceleration Threshold Method: Comparative Reliability to Previous Sprint Deceleration Analysis Methods in Team-Sport Athletes.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Sprint Deceleration Capacity in Front- and Side-Facing End Stances in Multidirectional Team Sport Athletes.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Assessing Deceleration Performance: Methodological and Practical Considerations.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-planned deceleration assessments are vital for profiling team sport athletes as they provide a measure of the athletes' ability to implement effective performance and protection strategies to tolerate the substantial mechanical forces. Although task requirements of these linear assessments are generally consistent, current research employs low sampling technology, which limits the ability to define the deceleration start point and subsequently the reliability. Therefore, this study compared the intra- and inter-day reliability of three deceleration assessment analysis methods: set distance, peak velocity, and the novel deceleration threshold, using a motorized linear encoder device. Ten female and 10 male subjects performed three maximal effort 30 m sprint deceleration trials over two testing days. Each trial was filtered and analyzed using a customized code to calculate key deceleration metrics: distance-to-stop (DTS), time-to-stop (TTS), and average deceleration (DEC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.