Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044493›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Implementation and effectiveness of teleneonatology for neonatal intensive care units: a protocol for a hybrid type III implementation pilot.

Josephine Wagenaar, Ron van Beek, Henrike Pas, Martijn Suurveld, Anne Jacobs, Naomi Van der Linden, Julia Broos, Maaike Kleinsmann, Saba Hinrichs, Irwin Reiss and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Josephine WagenaarPaediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0428-2685
Ron van BeekDepartment of paediatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands.
Henrike PasPaediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands.
Martijn SuurveldMedical Technology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Anne JacobsDepartment of paediatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands.
Naomi Van der LindenHealth Institute, TU Delft TPM, Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Julia BroosDepartment of Design Organization and Strategy, TU Delft IDE, Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Maaike KleinsmannDepartment of Design Organization and Strategy, TU Delft IDE, Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Saba HinrichsHealth Institute, TU Delft TPM, Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Irwin ReissPaediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands.
H Rob TaalPaediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands h.taal@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine in neonatal care (TeleNeonatology) has the potential to improve neonatal outcomes, address capacity challenges and influence the emotional burden on parents. TeleNeonatology allows for real-time audiovisual communication between healthcare providers at different neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Despite the high potential for multiple neonatal use-cases, TeleNeonatology is primarily being used for neonatal resuscitation and has yet to be widely implemented in Europe. Our study aims to evaluate both implementation strategies and effectiveness of TeleNeonatology in a pilot study in The Netherlands.

methodsA pre-post implementation study with hybrid type III design will be conducted from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2024. The year 2023 will serve as a baseline period pre-implementation. From 1 January 2024, a TeleNeonatology device will be integrated within all communication between the NICU-level IV of the Erasmus MC hospital and the NICU-level II at Amphia Hospital. Outcomes of the implementation of the TeleNeo programme will be evaluated using a mixed-methods approach evaluating implementation outcomes, service outcomes and client outcomes. Feasibility, the primary implementation outcome, will be evaluated via a validated questionnaire for parents and personnel. Secondary implementation outcomes will be barriers and facilitators of implementation, based on semi-structured interviews and focus groups. A cost minimisation analysis, using decision trees, will be evaluated as service outcomes. Client outcomes will be assessed via parent-reported transfer experience questionnaires and interviews and the clinical outcomes NICU-level III transfer rate and length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was reviewed by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre, who confirmed that the rules laid down in the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act do not apply (identification number: MEC-2023-0561). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals in two separate scientific articles: the primary evaluation and the cost evaluation.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalTelemedicineHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPilot ProjectsNeonatologyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID40044493
PMCPMC11883619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.