Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40044450›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.

Matt Wachowiak, Adam Dewan, Thomas Bozza, Tom F O'Connell, Elizabeth J Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Simultaneous detection and estimation in olfactory sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuron synchronization analyzed through spatial-temporal attention.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matt WachowiakDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 matt.wachowiak@utah.edu ejhong@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4508-9793
Adam DewanDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Thomas BozzaDepartment of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-8154
Tom F O'ConnellDivision of Biology & Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
Elizabeth J HongDivision of Biology & Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.

Funding

The Structure of Olfactory Neural and Perceptual SpacesU19NS112953 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MAINLAND, JOEL D · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
Odor Coding in the Dorsal Tenia TectaR01DC020720 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Adam Kabir Dewan · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020720NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems enable organisms to detect and respond to environmental signals relevant for their survival and reproduction. A crucial aspect of any sensory signal is its intensity; understanding how sensory signals guide behavior requires probing sensory system function across the range of stimulus intensities naturally experienced by an organism. In olfaction, defining the range of natural odorant concentrations is difficult. Odors are complex mixtures of airborne chemicals emitting from a source in an irregular pattern that varies across time and space, necessitating specialized methods to obtain an accurate measurement of concentration. Perhaps as a result, experimentalists often choose stimulus concentrations based on empirical considerations rather than with respect to ecological or behavioral context. Here, we attempt to determine naturally relevant concentration ranges for olfactory stimuli by reviewing and integrating data from diverse disciplines. We compare odorant concentrations used in experimental studies in rodents and insects with those reported in different settings including ambient natural environments, the headspace of natural sources, and within the sources themselves. We also compare these values to psychophysical measurements of odorant detection threshold in rodents, where thresholds have been extensively measured. Odorant concentrations in natural regimes rarely exceed a few parts per billion, while most experimental studies investigating olfactory coding and behavior exceed these concentrations by several orders of magnitude. We discuss the implications of this mismatch and the importance of testing odorants in their natural concentration range for understanding neural mechanisms underlying olfactory sensation and odor-guided behaviors.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionSmellAnimalsHumansSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID40044450
PMCPMC11884396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.