ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immature olfactory sensory neurons provide complementary input in the intact olfactory system.iScience · 2026Article
- Odors Smell Like Their Components: A Linear Framework for Predicting Olfactory Mixture Perception.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Rapid odorant metabolism organizes identity- and timing-based odor representations by olfactory bulb inputs and outputs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evidence that interglomerular inhibition generates non-monotonic concentration-response relationships in mitral/tufted glomeruli in the mouse olfactory bulb.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Exogenous Tannase and Papain on the Flavor Quality of Black Tea During Fermentation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perception and neural representation of intermittent odor stimuli in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Sparse input representations explain odor discrimination in complex, concentration-varying mixtures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous detection and estimation in olfactory sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mice and humans evaluate odor stimulus strength using common psychophysical principles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Long-lasting effects of lavender exposure on brain resting-state networks in healthy women.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neuron synchronization analyzed through spatial-temporal attention.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems enable organisms to detect and respond to environmental signals relevant for their survival and reproduction. A crucial aspect of any sensory signal is its intensity; understanding how sensory signals guide behavior requires probing sensory system function across the range of stimulus intensities naturally experienced by an organism. In olfaction, defining the range of natural odorant concentrations is difficult. Odors are complex mixtures of airborne chemicals emitting from a source in an irregular pattern that varies across time and space, necessitating specialized methods to obtain an accurate measurement of concentration. Perhaps as a result, experimentalists often choose stimulus concentrations based on empirical considerations rather than with respect to ecological or behavioral context. Here, we attempt to determine naturally relevant concentration ranges for olfactory stimuli by reviewing and integrating data from diverse disciplines. We compare odorant concentrations used in experimental studies in rodents and insects with those reported in different settings including ambient natural environments, the headspace of natural sources, and within the sources themselves. We also compare these values to psychophysical measurements of odorant detection threshold in rodents, where thresholds have been extensively measured. Odorant concentrations in natural regimes rarely exceed a few parts per billion, while most experimental studies investigating olfactory coding and behavior exceed these concentrations by several orders of magnitude. We discuss the implications of this mismatch and the importance of testing odorants in their natural concentration range for understanding neural mechanisms underlying olfactory sensation and odor-guided behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.