ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025
Identification and Mitigation of Pyrolysis Products in Laser-Cut Paper for Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Analysis of Proteins and Peptides by Electrokinetic Stacking Coupled with Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) often employs laser cutting to prepare paper substrates, potentially inducing localized thermal decomposition of the cellulose backbone. This work investigates how cellulose pyrolysis products and inherent background molecules within the paper affect PS-MS signal quality and evaluates paper pretreatment methods to enhance performance. Comparative analyses of laser-cut and razor-cut paper using mass spectrometry and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis) showed significant differences. Laser-cut paper exhibited elevated MS blank signals and higher absorbance in the 200-400 nm UV region, indicating increased chemical abundance and complexity. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) identified over 20 residual compounds on laser-cut paper absent in razor-cut samples, half of which were identified as known cellulose pyrolysis products. Washing the paper substrates with methanol, water, or dilute nitric acid significantly reduced both pyrolysis products and background molecules, with water showing the most improvement. Analyses of morphine, fentanyl, methamphetamine, voriconazole, and fluconazole showed no reduction in the signal after washing, with fentanyl and methamphetamine exhibiting a significantly increased MS signal, regardless of the cutting method. This work reveals that while pyrolysis products from laser cutting contribute to increased chemical noise, inherent background molecules in the paper also play a significant role. A simple water wash mitigates both issues, potentially improving the overall PS-MS performance for a range of analytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.