ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2025
Risk-Stratified Screening: A Simulation Study of Scheduling Templates on Daily Mammography Recalls.
Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Platform Architecture for Hospital Systems: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Timeliness of Follow-Up in Breast Cancer Screening.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2026Article
- Modeling Workflow, Operational, and Financial Implications of AI-Enabled Same-Day Diagnostic Follow-Up for Screening Mammograms.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Combined Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation for Healthcare Process Optimization: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nurse Staffing Management in the Context of Emergency Departments and Seasonal Respiratory Diseases: An Artificial Intelligence and Discrete-Event Simulation Approach.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRisk-stratified screening (RSS) scheduling may facilitate more effective use of same-day diagnostic testing for potentially abnormal mammograms, thereby reducing the need for follow-up appointments ("recall"). Our simulation study assessed the potential impact of RSS scheduling on patients recommended for same-day diagnostics.
methodsWe used a discrete event simulation to model workflow at a high-volume breast imaging center, incorporating artificial intelligence (AI)-triaged same-day diagnostic workups after screening mammograms. The RSS design sequences patients in the daily screening schedule using cancer risk categories developed from Tyrer-Cuzick and deep learning model scores. We compared recall variance, required hours of operation to accommodate all patients, and patient wait times using traditional (random) and RSS schedules.
resultsThe baseline simulation included 60 daily patients, with an average of 42% receiving screening mammograms and 11% (about three patients) being recommended for diagnostic workups. Compared with traditional scheduling, RSS scheduling reduces recall variance by up to 30% (1.98 versus 2.82, P < .05). With same-day diagnostics, RSS scheduling had a modest impact, increasing the number of patients served within normal operating hours by up to 1.3% (55.4 versus 54.7, P < .05), decreasing necessary operational hours by 12 min (10.3 versus 10.5 hours, P < .05), and increasing patient waiting times by an average of 2.4 min (0.24 versus 0.20 hours, P < .05).
conclusionOur simulation study suggests that RSS scheduling could reduce recall variance. This approach might enable same-day diagnostics using AI triage by accommodating patients within normal operating hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.